Wednesday, June 20, 2012

A Patient’s Perspective


I believe that the perspective of the patient is an important piece of the puzzle regarding whether an adverse event has occurred. I do think that patient’s must play a more active role in their health care by actively listen, asking questions, and critically thinking when someone is caring for them. As a health care provider, a majority of my patients do not ask me questions when I am caring for them. They acquiesce quite easily and favor for the procedure to be completed quickly. I can understand from their perspective that they do not want to be of a burden and be rude to those who is caring from them. But should an adverse event occur; the patient’s perspective can help prevent future mistakes from occurring again. Also, we must recognize that most adverse events are results from processes or systematic breakdown and not from a single source; “Blaming and punishing an individual and failing to change the process do not reverse the harm that has occurred and do nothing to decrease the likelihood of the same adverse event occurring again elsewhere in the organization” (Ransom, Joshi, Nash, & Ransom, 2008).

But the power of patient’s voicing their opinion is often overlooked. The Joint Commission established “Sentinel Events” for accredited organization; these are mandatory reporting for certain types of adverse events such as: infant abduction, suicide, radiation therapy to the wrong body region, or surgery on the wrong individual or wrong body part. This regulation was intended to increase accountability and is still use today. But for minimal or harmless errors, little to no reporting was done because there was no incentive in doing so (monetary returns) compared to a sentinel event. These “small” errors will likely remain unchanged and the likelihood for improvements will be nil. That is why patients must help voice any problems large or small by filling out surveys or reporting it directly to management, we cannot eliminate all human error but we can help minimize it; “When safety is part of everyone’s daily routine, errors exist but adverse events do not” (Ransom et al., 2008). We should not be fearful when making mistakes because errors will occur, it is how we learn and we must create a system in which human factors and safety are integrated together, only then we can fully approach solving patient safety.

Bibliography

 

Ransom, E. R., Joshi, M. S., Nash, D. B., & Ransom, S. B. (2008). The Healthcare Quality Book Second Edition. Chicago: Health Administration Press.

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Hospitals are trying a new business model, treating patients at home


That is true, with the cost of health care per patient is rising with no end in sight, hospitals are now turning towards home care to help reduce cost. A recent article in the Kaiser Health News network reported “More than 13 percent of all federal spending goes toward Medicare. Two thirds of that spending goes to the sickest 20 percent of Medicare beneficiaries, the ones with multiple chronic health conditions” (Schultz, 2012). These statistics are staggering, health care in the United States cannot continue down this path without any intervention.  With pressure mounting, health care leaders; doctors, hospital administrators, and researchers came up with a solution to rein in cost, by focusing patient care in their own home, hospitals can then reduce their liabilities versus having patient’s being cared for in the hospital.

Dr. Bruce Leff, a geriatrician and health researcher at Johns Hopkins University published a study showing how medical facilities can reduce cost by implementing six models of caring for seniors. The most popular model is called “Nurses Improving Care to Health system Elders, or NICHE, allowing nurses to take on a more proactive role towards focusing on common complications seniors would encounter; catheter infections or delirium. In contrast, another model called “Hospital at Home” did not garner much praise because unfortunately, Medicare does not pay hospitals for taking care of patient’s at their home as of yet, the system of revenue is still filing up hospital beds. Dr. Leff stated “Right now hospitals make money by filling beds, if I go to the hospital president and say, I’ll do a patient’s care at home, and Medicare doesn’t pay for that. It’s hard for them to give up revenue in that way” (Schultz, 2012). The results from his study have shown a reduction in cost and better patient outcomes, if this country is serious about lowering health care cost then all viable options should be utilized and antiquated laws amended, this country cannot afford inaction when there are helpful ideas out there.

Bibliography

Schultz, D. (2012, June 4). To Curb Spending On Elderly, Hospitals Try New Business Models. Retrieved June 5, 2012, from KaiserHeatlhNews: http://capsules.kaiserhealthnews.org/index.php/2012/06/to-curb-spending-on-elderly-hospitals-try-new-business-models/